The finish line of the novel is actually in sight. However, I'm having a moral conundrum--how much do I torture these guys at the end. My original planned ending is seeming a little . . . harsh.
Option 1: Category style ending. Wrap it up with new realizations for both characters, happy shiny (expected) ending
Option 2: Upping the drama--create the risk of something very bad happening, but wrap it up with a happy bow and good helping of risk-be-gone.
Option 3: Extra Special Torture Sauce--This is the planned ending. But something (okay a FEW) very bad things are going to happen to the characters--things that don't magically get better. They do get a happy, shiny ending, but it's not the one you might expect.
A lot of writers in my genre don't seem to cross the very-bad-things line: major characters don't die, the goal isn't lost, nothing is taken away that isn't returned later. I'm afraid if I cross the very-bad-thing line, my story won't be as appealing to readers (Ego piping up to add: and agents! and contest judges!)
This is weighing heavily on my mind right now because the book waiting in the wings BEGINS with something horrid happening--definetely one of those very bad things. The story is how the heroine makes peace with said very bad thing.
So readers, other writers, interested folk--weigh in--how much torture is too much torture? Say you pick up a book that claims to have a high degree of sexy fun. Are you (or the reader) going to be let down if something very bad happens to the character? Do you want (need) a rosy-ending? Are there certain bad things that should NEVER happen in a romance?

